Skip Navigation

Twentieth Century British History 2002 13(1):17-37; doi:10.1093/tcbh/13.1.17
© 2002 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bingham, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

‘Stop the Flapper Vote Folly’: Lord Rothermere, the Daily Mail, and the Equalization of the Franchise 1927–28

Adrian Bingham1

1 Merton College, Oxford

This essay re-examines the Daily Mail's campaign in 1927–8 against the Baldwin government's decision to equalize the franchise by lowering the female voting age to 21. It argues that the Mail's hostility to the ‘flapper vote’ was largely a product of the passionate anti-socialism of its proprietor, Lord Rothermere, and not, as has been suggested, the culmination of a decade of anti-feminism. Rothermere was convinced that young women would vote overwhelmingly for the Labour Party and entrench it in government for a generation. But attacks on the ‘flapper’ in 1927–8 were generally confined to the paper's editorial and political columns, and contrasted with the much more positive portrayal of young women that had been typical of the Mail's output since 1918. The example of the Daily Express, which supported franchise equalization, is used to demonstrate that it was Rothermere's idiosyncratic political pinions, rather than the ‘typical’ anti-feminism of the Conservative press, that explained the Mail's stance. The article concludes that the gender discourse of interwar newspapers has been unfairly stereotyped by historians, and that media hostility to young, unmarried women in these years has been exaggerated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.