Skip Navigation


Twentieth Century British History Advance Access originally published online on May 12, 2009
Twentieth Century British History 2009 20(3):370-395; doi:10.1093/tcbh/hwp016
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/370    most recent
hwp016v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nijhuis, D. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author [2009]. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rethinking the Beveridge Strait-jacket: The Labour Party, the TUC and the Introduction of Superannuation

Dennie Oude Nijhuis*

University of Leiden

*d.m.oude-nijhuis{at}hum.leidenuniv.nl.


   Abstract

This article highlights the role of the trade union movement in the failure of Labour's attempts to create adequate state pension benefits during the first half of the post-war period. It argues that union opposition to attempts to redistribute income among workers made it impossible for Labour to achieve a redistributive contributory solution for the shortcomings of the state pension. The initial choice of the ‘flawed’ Beveridge solution for social security, the failure of consecutive attempts to introduce national superannuation and the resulting inadequacy of state pension provision in the United Kingdom, can be understood only once we realize the importance of this opposition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.