Skip Navigation

Twentieth Century British History 2000 11(4):431-459; doi:10.1093/tcbh/11.4.431
© 2000 by Oxford University Press
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


ARTICLES

Why ‘Indicative Planning’ Failed: British Industry and the Formation of the National Economic Development Council (1960–64)

STEWART WOOD

Magdalen College Oxford

The NEDC (Neddy) was established in 1962 through a joint initiative of leading industrialists and the Conservative Government. Its broad aim was to improve economic co-ordination between companies and policy-makers, and thus enable Britain to steer a course away from ‘stop-go’ and towards stable growth. This article examines the sources of the Neddy's swift demise into irrelevance by 1964. Aspirations for the NEDC were multiple and conflicting. Leading industrialists considered it a vehicle for increasing their influence over the course of economic policy. The government, however, was jealous of its policy-making autonomy, and interested in the NEDC primarily as a signal to currency speculators of their commitment to tackling the various supply-side problems of the UK economy. The article stresses two sets of ‘institutional’ factors which doomed the NEDC's transformative potential even as it was being set up. First, business was suspicious of co-operation with (and, more particularly revealing sensitive firm level information to) a body that was so close to central government. Employers were justifiably worried that the NEDC would be used by future governments as the basis for more dirigiste rather than merely indicative planning. Second, companies wedded to the economic organizational principle of ‘collective laissez-faire’ resisted peak-level efforts to induce co-ordination. Thus, paradoxically, the very co-ordination problems in British business that prompted the NEDC's creation were the primary reasons for its failure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.